By Noah Lemos
Epistemology or the idea of information is likely one of the cornerstones of analytic philosophy, and this ebook presents a transparent and obtainable advent to the topic. It discusses the various major theories of justification, together with foundationalism, coherentism, reliabilism, and advantage epistemology. different themes comprise the Gettier challenge, internalism and externalism, skepticism, the matter of epistemic circularity, the matter of the criterion, a priori wisdom, and naturalized epistemology. meant basically for college kids taking a firstclass in epistemology, this lucid and well-written textual content may additionally offer a superb advent for someone attracted to figuring out extra approximately this crucial zone of philosophy.
Part of the Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy sequence.
Read Online or Download An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge PDF
Best epistemology books
This publication examines the main turbulent interval within the historical past of Jordan's ruling condominium, the six years following the assassination of the kingdom's founder, Abdullah (1951-1957). these years witnessed the country's lone episode of susceptible monarchy, whilst the king--the amateur Hussein or his ill-starred father, Talal--was no longer the preeminent political actor within the land.
This e-book deals a singular account of the connection of expertise to wisdom. The account builds at the intuitive concept that our usual perceptual judgments should not self sustaining, that an interdependence obtains among our view of the realm and our perceptual judgments. Anil Gupta exhibits during this vital examine that this interdependence is the main to a passable account of expertise.
The second one version of Naturalizing Epistemology has been up to date and elevated to incorporate seven new articles that soak up ongoing debates within the box. As with the 1st version, it explores the interplay among psychology and epistemology and addresses empirical questions about how we should always arrive at our beliefs,and even if the strategies wherein we arrive at our ideals are those during which we should arrive at our ideals.
Publication via Foley, Richard
- Epistemology: Contemporary Readings
- Representational Mind: A Study of Kant’s Theory of Knowledge
- The Slightest Philosophy
- Jean Piaget (Continuum Library of Educational Thought)
- Explanation and Understanding
- Aristotle on the Apparent Good: Perception, Phantasia, Thought, and Desire
Extra info for An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge
Again, we cannot say simply that if one has some evidence for a proposition, then one is justified in believing it. The evidence that one has might be defeated by one’s other information. 7 Suppose you go to a party and you learn that (h): Most of the people in the room are Democrats and John is in the room. We may say that h is evidence for (i) John is a Democrat. But now suppose you learn that (j): Most of the people on the right side of the room are not Democrats and John is on the right side of the room.
Suppose for example that Brown’s injuries, though severe, are not life threatening, and that Jones has promised to meet Smith at noon in order to pay a ransom that will save the lives of several hostages. Thus, if r defeats the requirement for q imposed by p, there might be further features that defeat r as a defeater for the requirement for q. 21 2 The traditional analysis and the Gettier problem In the last chapter we considered the view that knowledge is epistemically justified true belief. In this chapter, we shall consider some counterexamples to the justified true belief (JTB) account and consider some attempts to repair the definition of knowledge in light of these examples.
Defending the traditional JTB account of knowledge by rejecting one or both of Gettier’s presuppositions about justification does not appear to be a promising approach. The philosophical literature is rich, however, with other sorts of approaches. Some philosophers have focused on the justification requirement for knowledge. ’’ According to this idea, a Gettier case involves justified true belief, but the subject’s justification is in some way ‘‘defective’’ or not the right sort to yield knowledge.